On Friday, 26 June 2015 at 13:32:39 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Just in case it wasn't clear : I will vote "no" on this proposal as long as it features longish "readable" names like "shouldEquals".
You'd rather `should!"=="`? I'm not sure which I'd prefer; the thing is that so far you're the only one strongly against it. The only other thing I heard was a question at DConf on why it wasn't `assertEquals` instead.
Atila
