On 7/15/15 12:09 PM, "Marc =?UTF-8?B?U2Now7x0eiI=?= <schue...@gmx.net>"
wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2015 at 15:49:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 7/15/15 11:48 AM, Wyatt wrote:
On Wednesday, 15 July 2015 at 15:28:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
These google searches returned no meaningful results:
Try:
splat operator
That doesn't come to mind when splat is used as a noun. --
Yeah, "splat" as a name for an auto-expanding thingy would be a novelty.
Ruby for instance doesn't have anything like that, it has a splat
_operator_ (asterisk) to expand a normal array, or conversely, capture
several arguments in one parameter.
So I'd say this is a strong argument against "splat". -- Andrei
