On Thursday, 16 July 2015 at 17:39:13 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Thursday, 16 July 2015 at 16:13:46 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/16/15 11:59 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:50:25AM -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 7/15/15 8:49 PM, Mike wrote:
1. "AliasSeq" is no good as evident from the first post
that started
this thread
I am egging my face for starting this. Can we please return
to
AliasSeq? -- Andrei
Yes, let's please return to AliasSeq. It's a pretty lousy
name, but all
the alternatives are even worse. Let's not fix the problem by
making it
worse.
WE HAVE CONSENSUS! :o)
(Well... anyone else in favor?)
Yes, me. ;)
— David
+1 for AliasSeq
