Re: Better lambdas!!!!!!!!!!

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 10 September 2015 at 17:55:06 UTC, Prudence wrote:

by specifying the parameter names in the signature, we don't have to specify them in the lamba creation. This doesn't replace the original way, just adds the ability to infer the names if they are not specified.

Of course, this hides the names outside the lambda, but a warning could be issued(no different than if one does it explicitly.

How about just having numbered parameters like this:

{ $2 < ($1*$2) }