Re: LRU cache for ~=

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

Rainer Deyke wrote:

Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

One surprising (but safe) behavior that remains with slices is this:

void fun(int[] a) {
   a[0] = 0;
   a ~= 42;
   a[0] = 42;
}

The caller may or may not see 42 in the first slot after the call.

Your definition of "safe" is clearly not aligned with mine.

What's yours?

Andrei