Rainer Deyke wrote:
Denis Koroskin wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 03:00:57 +0400, Rainer Deyke <rain...@eldwood.com>
wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
One surprising (but safe) behavior that remains with slices is this:
void fun(int[] a) {
a[0] = 0;
a ~= 42;
a[0] = 42;
}
The caller may or may not see 42 in the first slot after the call.
Your definition of "safe" is clearly not aligned with mine.
Safe as in SafeD (i.e. no memory corruption) :)
If the caller wasn't expecting the array to be modified, then that's a
textbook case of memory corruption.
[citation needed]
Andrei
