On 2009-10-19 10:14:02 -0400, dsimcha <dsim...@yahoo.com> said:
== Quote from downs (default_357-l...@yahoo.de)'s article
Walter Bright wrote:
Probably not. But you can rewrite:
a ~= stuff;
as:
a = a ~ stuff;
to make it work.
Is there any reason the first can't be a short-hand for the second?
Devil's advocate because I somewhat agree with you: a = a ~ stuff; is so
inefficient that it should be ugly.
I'd call that a premature optimization of the programmer's behavior. :-)
--
Michel Fortin
michel.for...@michelf.com
http://michelf.com/
