On Saturday, 26 September 2015 at 14:31:15 UTC, Artur Skawina
wrote:
Given the DMD licensing situation, nobody will (or should) even
look inside the DMD repo for info. Especially that "backend"
string is really scary. I decided to blindly trust your words
above, and, with trembling hands, somehow managed to click that
link. Phew. That file really appears to be boost licensed.
...>
Open source code hidden somewhere deep inside a non-free
compiler implementation might just as well not exist, as noone
interested will be willing to look for it there.
out of curiosity, what is your concern? as I understand it you
can produce derived works but the restriction is on
redistribution of the compiler, and if you care about that you
ask Walter and he says yes.
