On Saturday, 26 September 2015 at 19:22:16 UTC, Laeeth Isharc
wrote:
On Saturday, 26 September 2015 at 14:31:15 UTC, Artur Skawina
wrote:
Given the DMD licensing situation, nobody will (or should)
even look inside the DMD repo for info. Especially that
"backend" string is really scary. I decided to blindly trust
your words above, and, with trembling hands, somehow managed
to click that link. Phew. That file really appears to be boost
licensed.
...>
Open source code hidden somewhere deep inside a non-free
compiler implementation might just as well not exist, as noone
interested will be willing to look for it there.
out of curiosity, what is your concern? as I understand it you
can produce derived works but the restriction is on
redistribution of the compiler, and if you care about that you
ask Walter and he says yes.
Those who have had to deal with copyright lawyers become
paranoid: ;)
http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.2659.1403347797.2907.digitalmar...@puremagic.com
http://forum.dlang.org/post/dmfr07$2u3u$1...@digitaldaemon.com
http://forum.dlang.org/post/euuvum$171f$1...@digitalmars.com
