On 10/14/15 9:24 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2015-10-13 14:56, Dicebot wrote:
I still have no idea why I would ever use `synchronized` (any automatic
thread synchronization is harmful in my opinion) so change itself is
irrelevant. But it may break quite some old Java-liked 3d party code for
no benefit and that would be annoying.
Like DWT :)
That may be worrisome. Any information on how many are using DWT, and
how badly it would break if we pulled the change?
If we assess there's too much breakage, we can define a DIP and make the
check opt-in via a flag -dipNN.
Andrei
