On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 18:38:38 UTC, Charles Pritchard
wrote:
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 10:24:34 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/15/15 11:11 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 06:36:32 UTC, logicchains
wrote:
Even if it's not entirely logical, all these unfinished
aspects can
add up to produce a less positive aesthetic impression of
the language
...
I would agree that we're less polished than Go and other
languages. This is something we need to work on - just show
the world a completely defined and implemented language. --
Andrei
I'd like to see a roadmap, covering some of the pain points
that logicchains brought up. It'd be nice to look at it, and
get the impression that those issues will be resolved within an
estimated time period; mainly around GC and ref.
Making a roadmap when you don't have people you pay to stick to
it doesn't really work. It's like trying to transport frogs using
a wheelbarrel.