"Steven Schveighoffer" <schvei...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:op.u16piilgeav...@localhost.localdomain... > On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:54:40 -0400, AJ <a...@nospam.net> wrote: > >> >> "Steven Schveighoffer" <schvei...@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:op.u16lelraeav...@localhost.localdomain... >>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:46:37 -0400, AJ <a...@nospam.net> wrote: > >>> If you want to argue tired old arguments, >> >> Oh, you were arguing? About what? I just asked "Why?". > > And I answered.
No you didn't. If you would have given an answer, then I would still have a question. > And you seemed to continue "not arguing." I guess we have a fundamental > disconnect on what you want, so I guess I'll stop posting on this thread > in order to save time and effort of my own :P Thanks. > > I'll just re-answer the question in the same manner I would to a child who > continually asks "why": Because. OK, I'll try and let you know I decide (if it's yay or nay) on the semicolon thing (it may be awhile if I have to figure it out by implementing a language rather than just research the documented knowledge/opinions of others though, so don't hold your breath). > >>> In other words, my statement was a tip, not >>> an attack ;) >> >> Bullshit. You meant it as "an order" and you know it. :P > > Now who's misinterpreting? ;) You the opportunist thinking everyone is fooled by your antics.