On Thursday, 26 November 2015 at 12:29:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2015-11-25 11:17, Suliman wrote:
[...]
BTW, why was not TOML [1] chosen? I know it was discussed but I
can't remember why SDL was preferred. I think TOML is more
widely used than SDL [2]. GitLib CI multi runner is also using
it.
[1] https://github.com/toml-lang/toml
[2] https://github.com/toml-lang/toml#projects-using-toml
TOML looks nice, _but_ it's version 0.4.0. We cannot afford to
maintain a parser for a format that hasn't "settled down" yet.
