Re: Collections question

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 11/29/15 5:06 AM, Atila Neves wrote:

On Friday, 27 November 2015 at 20:14:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

There's this oddity of built-in hash tables: a reference to a
non-empty hash table can be copied and then both references refer to
the same hash table object. However, if the hash table is null,
copying the reference won't track the same object later on.

[...]

static opCAll is just confusing IMHO. Factory function please.

Thanks all. I'll go with the factory function. -- Andrei