On Thursday, 3 December 2015 at 20:51:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
I vaguely remembered I saw something like this a while ago:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/f11894a098c6
The trick could be more fluent, but it might have merit. Has
anyone explored it? Is it a viable candidate for becoming a D
idiom?
I was looking at this in conjunction with choosing a naming
convention for container functions. Some functions are "stable"
so that would be part of their name, e.g. insertStable or
stableInsert. With this, it's possible to write
lst.stable.insert.
Andrei
I don't understand how it is namespace (it's just named scope for
me) and why do we need template for that? Probably struct with
static members would work the same without need for instantiating
the template.
When talking about namespaces in the C++ sense, the feature of
namespace is that it can be scattered among many files and can be
'using'.
