Andrei Alexandrescu, el 23 de octubre a las 13:06 me escribiste: > Pelle Månsson wrote: > >bearophile wrote: > >>Yigal Chripun: > >> > >>>Hell no. This is why I hate certain programming languages. > >>>if you are trying to obfuscate the language than why not just define: > >>>rtqfrdsg and fdkjtkf as the function names? > >> > >>Don't be silly. In my dlibs "xsomething" are the lazy functions, > >>and "something" are the strict ones. That's not obfuscated, you > >>need seconds to learn a single easy rule. > >> > >>Bye, > >>bearophile > >I think the complaint was not as much about the x as the iota. > >Seriously, iota? > > > >However, I like the array(range(0,10)) where range is always lazy, > >and array forces eagerness, better than separate xrange and range > >functions. > > Orthogonality for the win.
Sometimes "practicality beats purity" :) But I don't really care that much about this one... -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DIEZ "PUNGAS" MENOS -- Crónica TV