On 09.01.2016 23:36, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Friday, 8 January 2016 at 22:32:59 UTC, anonymous wrote:
[...]
4) Fonts
[...]
One nitpick here: can you change the function signatures to use a
monospace font (any will do really)?
Done.
Also, can you institute this change
to the function signatures as well:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1169
It's already in. You have to look at the pre-release docs. The release
docs are built with an older dmd.
Example:
http://d-ag0aep6g.rhcloud.com/phobos-prerelease/std_algorithm_searching.html#.commonPrefix
5) Justified Text
[...]
See my arguments here:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/1152
I'm going the conservative route for now, keeping the text justified. I
don't think hyphenation/justification is worth the troubles, but Andrei
is the one that would have to be convinced here.
6) Red For Clickables Only?
[...]
I would take the converse of your conclusion because I have to disagree
with the use of red for links. People expect links to be blue and
underlined and darker when they are already visited; it's one of the
only design standards that exists on the web.
If you change links to be blue, then you can keep red as a highlight color.
I think that standard is pretty weak, more of a default really.
We want a red site, not a blue one. Links are the site's number one
source of color. Blue links would make for a blue site with a red bar on
top.
Re visited links: I removed the :visited styling without thinking too
much about it, as I don't consider it very important. Am I wrong?
