On 8 January 2016 at 23:40, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 1/7/2016 9:14 PM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote: >> >> The namespace offers nothing, and introduces problems. We don't want it. > > > The problems you were having were due to two bugs, since corrected, and one > misunderstanding on how name lookups were done.
Nope. I've tried the latest nightly against my code. I can confirm the forward-referencing issues seem to be gone, but I had already worked very hard to arrange and order my code to avoid that issue, so that wasn't actually my problem (as I suspected). This patch allows me to un-obfuscate my code by putting it back in readable order, but the rest of my issues seem to be un-changed. They are all name-in-namespace resolution related. As a quick test, I changed extern(C++, ns), to extern(C++) in the files where it couldn't find anything, and all the symbols became visible and everything worked as it should (except obviously I couldn't link). Sadly, I don't have any more time I can allocate to this, I'll have to chip away at it any further after hours. I really hoped I could get this working over Christmas. I'll continue to try and reduce the structure of the problem, but I still just wish you'd remove the namespace scope. Everything would be fixed instantly, I am certain of this. This design doesn't give us anything, and you seem to be resisting making an argument for its existence. We don't need to do this, we don't need to waste any more time.
