On Tuesday, 12 January 2016 at 22:28:13 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 01/12/2016 03:56 PM, John Colvin wrote:
Please consider the second design I proposed?
I don't think it solves a large problem. -- Andrei
Ok. Would you consider any solution, or is that a "leave it
broken"?
I think I can find a way around the problem for my purposes in
the short term. However, for other people implementing custom
types I think it is important, it's a dirty corner that needs
sorting out. The more you get to know D, the more of them you
find, the more frustrating it gets seeing they aren't likely to
get fixed...
