On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 15:51:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 10:39:03 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 09:33:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
No that would be stupid to make that the default as it is unsafe.

When would you estimate that D could have a production ready default memory managment solution (without GC)?


Now, D can do the exact same as C++ .

Not really, but that was not the question. So let me repeat:

When would you estimate that D will have a production ready default memory management solution (without GC).

  • C++17 Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
    • Re: C++17 deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
      • Re: C++17 Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
        • Re: C++17 deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
          • Re: C++17 Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
            • Re: C++17 deadalnix via Digitalmars-d
              • Re: C++17 Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
                • Re: C... rsw0x via Digitalmars-d
                • Re: C... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
                • Re: C... bachmeier via Digitalmars-d
                • Re: C... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
                • Re: C... bachmeier via Digitalmars-d
                • Re: C... bachmeier via Digitalmars-d
                • Re: C... Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
                • Re: C... Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d

Reply via email to