On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 15:59:37 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 15:51:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 10:39:03 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 January 2016 at 09:33:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
No that would be stupid to make that the default as it is
unsafe.
When would you estimate that D could have a production ready
default memory managment solution (without GC)?
Now, D can do the exact same as C++ .
Not really, but that was not the question. So let me repeat:
When would you estimate that D will have a production ready
default memory management solution (without GC).
I don't think it is desirable. I do think we should focus on
having GC.malloc/GC.free have the same level of perfs than
malloc/free, which is very doable.
Now as to when, well, I'm waiting for your PR.
