On Wednesday, 27 January 2016 at 09:00:17 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
The response from the D community seems to be an overwhelming "It's fine as is" when it's obviously not. Which is making me question sinking more time into D if there actually is no cohesive plan to make D an actual C++ competitor rather than a toy language as it currently stands.
I can't take any of this seriously as long as ConcernedDev1950 do not provide any PR.
