On Wednesday, 3 February 2016 at 00:57:18 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/2/16 3:50 PM, Atila Neves wrote:
On Tuesday, 2 February 2016 at 20:02:39 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/2/16 11:02 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
On Friday, 29 January 2016 at 12:08:01 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
As has been discussed before there's been discussion about
std.algorithm.reduce taking the "wrong" order of arguments
(its
definition predates UFCS). I recall the conclusion was
there'd be
subtle ambiguities if we worked reduce to implement both
orders.
So the next best solution is to introduce a new name such
as the
popular "fold", and put them together in the documentation.
Thoughts?
Andrei
Definitely yes.
Atila, wanna do the honors? -- Andrei
If it's not urgent, sure.
Thanks! And don't forget: in D, everything is top priority. --
Andrei
Of course it is ;)
I guess this is to be a brand new PR? I've been reading the old
one and the discussions. A lot of unanswered questions there and
I have a new opinion on at least one of them.
Atila
