On Monday, 8 February 2016 at 09:12:25 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
I don't think we've used DIPs for library additions before. I don't see what it would provide over module documentation.

Probably because a standard library should keep things simple, meaning it should unify high level functionality on aggregates as ranges/iterators or a generalization over streams/ranges that is as simple as possible across the board.

If not, then why have it in the standard library?

Reply via email to