On Saturday, 13 February 2016 at 13:10:19 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/13/16 7:40 AM, John Colvin wrote:
On Saturday, 13 February 2016 at 00:30:58 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 02/12/2016 06:52 PM, deadalnix wrote:
[...]
I think we're good there. -- Andrei
Is there somewhere where I / others can see an explanation of
how "we're
good"? Those sound like genuine problems.
Those are just a soup of generic considerations that could be
brought about any code. -- andrei
Indeed, I just explained why some major moved away from it, it is
not like it is relevant. I mean, it is not like this is proposed
as a way to handle memory management in the language down the
road.
