On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 22:19 -0800, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote: […] > > One thing I adore about github is it provides a legal audit trail of > where the > code came from. While that proves nothing about whether contributions > are stolen > or not, it provides a date stamp (like my registered copyright did), > and if > stolen code does make its way into the code base, it can be precisely > excised. > Github takes a great load off my mind. […]
Has there been case law in the USA that gives a Git log official status as a record of history? I haven't done a detailed search here, but I am not aware of any case law in the UK on this. Other jursidictions will have their own rules obviously. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part