On Tuesday, 1 March 2016 at 21:00:30 UTC, Erik Smith wrote:
I'm back to actively working on a std.database specification & implementation. It's still unstable, minimally tested, and there is plenty of work to do, but I wanted to share an update on my progress.
I suggest you call the package stdx.db - it is not (and may not become) a standard package, so `std` is out of question. If it is supposed to be *proposed* as standard package, then `stdx` is good because that is what some people have used in the past (while others used the ugly std.experimental. for the same purpose).
I humbly believe that this effort **must** be collaborative as such package is doomed to fail if done wrong.
