On Thursday, 17 March 2016 at 12:51:28 UTC, Nordlöw wrote:
I believe `isConvertableTo` is a more Phobos-compliant naming, right?

Correction: Should be named `isConvertibleTo`.

BTW: We already have https://dlang.org/phobos/std_traits.html#isImplicitlyConvertible

Why don't we already have

    isConvertibleTo

or/and

    isExplicitlyConvertibleTo

Reply via email to