On 14 May 2016 at 00:00, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: > On 13 May 2016 at 07:12, Manu via Digitalmars-d > <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: >> On 13 May 2016 at 11:03, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d >> <digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote: >>> On 5/12/2016 4:32 PM, Marco Leise wrote: >>>> >>>> - Unless CTFE uses soft-float implementation, depending on >>>> compiler and flags used to compile a D compiler, resulting >>>> executable produces different CTFE floating-point results >>> >>> >>> I've actually been thinking of writing a 128 bit float emulator, and then >>> using that in the compiler internals to do all FP computation with. >> >> No. Do not. >> I've worked on systems where the compiler and the runtime don't share >> floating point precisions before, and it was a nightmare. > > I have some bad news for you about CTFE then. This already happens in > DMD even though float is not emulated. :-o
O_O Are you saying 'float' in CTFE is not 'float'? I protest this about as strongly as I can muster...
