On Sunday, 12 June 2016 at 21:32:18 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
On Sunday, 12 June 2016 at 12:42:23 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
The standard has moved on, the bar on performance has raised, and dmdscript hasn't even kept up with changes in D.

Not too worried about the performance, but EcmaScript 6 has increased the feature set so much that the spec is over twice as large as for EcmaScript 5... And Chrome 52 is apparently shipping with both ES6 and some ES7, so it will be hard to keep up.

Seems like it's a dead race. DMDScript has been in the attic for too long. Trying to play catch up with Google, an Internet company, seems hardly worth the effort.

Reply via email to