On Wednesday, 22 June 2016 at 17:55:11 UTC, Joerg Joergonson
wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 June 2016 at 16:51:32 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 June 2016 at 16:44:25 UTC, Joerg Joergonson
wrote:
How bout Freezing Phobos, except for bugs and start migrating
it to Phobos 2.0?.
This would kill the language.
How is that? That makes no sense. If Phobo's is production
ready as claimed then freezing it can't make it automagically
non-production ready, can it?
The DMD developers refuse to use Phobos in the D compiler, so
Phobos is obviously not production ready.
(Plenty of compilers use the C++ standard library.)
I agree with the need for a D3 and a completely redesigned
standard library though. But it will only happen as a fork, not
from within the current team...
