On 24.06.2016 08:49, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>I don't care about any of the limits. ^^ has an essential
>discontinuity at (0,0), so the limits don't need to have a bearing on
>how you define the value, but if they do, consider that there is only
>one direction in which the limit is 0, and an uncountably infinite
>number of directions in which the limit is 1.
Are you sure about this? I'm pretty sure you can define f(x)^g(x) where
f(0)=g(0)=0, such that the limit as x->0 can be made to approach any
number you wish.
Yes. I was talking about straight lines.
