On 06/24/2016 10:03 AM, Kagamin wrote:
On Thursday, 23 June 2016 at 23:33:46 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
I don't want to argue this at all. x^^0 is an empty product no matter
what set I choose x and 0 from. 0^^0 = 1 is the only reasonable
convention, and this is absolutely painfully obvious from where I
stand. What context are you using 'pow' in that would suggest otherwise?
You can build a non-analytical flavor of pow on top of the analytical
flavor:
int pow1(int x, int y)
{
if(x==0 && y==0)return 1;
return pow(x,y);
}
Apparently that's what powr/pow do? -- Andrei
