On Wednesday, 29 June 2016 at 05:06:08 UTC, Hiemlick Hiemlicker wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 June 2016 at 03:50:35 UTC, Carl Vogel wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 June 2016 at 03:11:52 UTC, Hiemlick
[...]
Doesn't the with statement solve your problem here?

with (myEnum) {
    test(A);
    test(B);
    test(C);
}

Not really it's, only half the way there. Why not extend the language the extra step?

I'm not sure I understand how it doesn't. Inside the with scope you could refer to myEnum members by their (unqualified) names alone. Isn't this the behaviour you're asking for?

As a pet peeve of mine, it's unfortunate that with: cannot be used as attributes can, to last until the end of the current scope without adding a new one.

void foo()
{
    with(myEnum):  // doesn't work

    test(A);
    test(B);
    test(C);
}

Reply via email to