On Wednesday, 29 June 2016 at 05:06:08 UTC, Hiemlick Hiemlicker
wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 June 2016 at 03:50:35 UTC, Carl Vogel wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 June 2016 at 03:11:52 UTC, Hiemlick
[...]
Doesn't the with statement solve your problem here?
with (myEnum) {
test(A);
test(B);
test(C);
}
Not really it's, only half the way there. Why not extend the
language the extra step?
I'm not sure I understand how it doesn't. Inside the with scope
you could refer to myEnum members by their (unqualified) names
alone. Isn't this the behaviour you're asking for?
As a pet peeve of mine, it's unfortunate that with: cannot be
used as attributes can, to last until the end of the current
scope without adding a new one.
void foo()
{
with(myEnum): // doesn't work
test(A);
test(B);
test(C);
}