On 10.08.2016 22:36, Dicebot wrote:
http://forum.dlang.org/post/pqsiqmkxenrwxoruz...@forum.dlang.org
The first DIP has just landed into the new queue. It is a proposal from
language authors and thus it bypasses usual nitpicking process and
proceeds straight to requesting community (your!) feedback.
Essentially, it is an attempt to solve reference lifetime problem by
extending implementation of `scope` keyword.
Proposal text: https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1000.md
This proposes to add a kind of information the type system is supposed
to track (lifetimes), which cannot be communicated losslessly across
function and aggregate boundaries. Hence it won't work well in its
current form.
