On Friday, 19 August 2016 at 23:12:39 UTC, Engine Machine wrote:
On Friday, 19 August 2016 at 22:20:09 UTC, Enamex wrote:
On Friday, 19 August 2016 at 18:25:06 UTC, Engine Machine
wrote:
[...]
Something like this:
class Type(T: typeof(null)) { //< L1 (specialization)
int x;
}
class Dog {}
class Type(T) : Type!(typeof(null)) { //< L2 (`typeof(null)`)
static if(is(T: Dog)) //< L3 (`is(MyType: IntendedType)`
or `is(MyType == ExactType)`)
int y;
}
What you're looking for is "specialization", on line "L1".
Also some corrections on lines "L2" and "L3"
How is this any different, besides adding meaningless
complexity, to inheritence as it already is?
Um, not sure what you mean. This isn't suggesting adding
anything; it's already legal/compiles.
