On 9/8/16 12:06 PM, John Colvin wrote:
I think it's too late for this stuff now for D anyway. There are workarounds that make life acceptable without default constructors, I can't see how we could add them without getting into a real mess.
A good point. I should mention, however, that the lack of a default constructor made at least one reference counting (in fact reference linking IIRC) impossible in D.
One thing we could look at is allow only CTFEable default constructors. Andrei
