On Saturday, 1 October 2016 at 13:43:02 UTC, yawniek wrote:
On Friday, 30 September 2016 at 09:41:55 UTC, Chris wrote:
[...]
its definitly 100% usabe, we use it in production.
and it has a much easier API than all the other libs.
we created it especially for the purpose of easy (and blazing
fast!) data extraction from json.
give it a spin and report feedback.
unfortunately i have not had the time yet to write a more
detailed blog article.
The reason the warning is there is:
- validation: we usually do not care about a few corrupt
records within millions, thus there is this feature to
silently ignore those, i think you still can make these records
fail loudly.
- we don't know yet where asdf is bad at, thus we need more
feedback
- we are open to change the naming convention of the attributes
if someone comes up with good reasoning
It would definitely be great to see an article about asdf for
the D blog IMHO. I'd like to see it in action in a real case as
thoses are much better at showing the strength of the library. If
you could throw some time at it it would be awesome.
