On 10/12/2016 10:39 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 at 14:12:30 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/12/2016 09:39 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
Thanks! I'd say make sure there is exactly 0% loss on performance
compared to the popFront in the ASCII case, and if so make a PR with
the table version. -- Andrei
I measured again.
The table version has a DECREASES the performance for dmd by 1%.
I think we should keep performance for dmd in mind.
I could add the table version in a version (LDC) block.
No need. 1% for dmd is negligible. 25% would raise an eyebrow. -- Andrei
