On 14.11.2016 21:26, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 14.11.2016 00:32, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
A Foo[] can be stored in a Foo, because it doesn't need the size. But
yes, as soon as you start needing Appender functions, then the compiler
chokes.
It is a forward reference bug, but still a bug IMO. If you can store the
appender, then the compiler knows how big it has to be. So it should be
fine at that point.
Paging Timon, I'm betting your front end handles this just fine ;)
-Steve
It does. :)
Minimal example:
struct Appender(A){
alias T = typeof({ A a; return a[0]; }());
T[] data;
void put(T item){ data~=item; }
}
struct Foo{ Appender!(Foo[]) fooAppender; }
Foo[] test(){
Foo f;
f.fooAppender.put(Foo());
return f.fooAppender.data;
}
static assert(test().length==1);
Error with DMD, works with my front end.
Coincidentally, I've tried compiling your front end with latest dmd just
yesterday. There is one file missing, though: cent_.d. Could you please
commit this, too?
The cent code commented out, I noticed your code is suffering from the
same issue as the OP (also happens for AAs, e.g. T[int]). A workaround
is to use void[] and wrap it in property functions.
I've fixed/worked around a number of issues in dmd with respect to
incomplete semantic analysis that happen with template mixins, but more
still pop up afterwards.
Are there limitations to what the front end understands? Is it able to
digest itself? That would be pretty impressive ;-)
