Ellery Newcomer wrote:
KennyTM~ wrote:
On Nov 17, 09 01:48, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:30 AM, KennyTM~<kenn...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 17, 09 01:12, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:24 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu
<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
Walter Bright wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I was hoping the lesson learned would be to fix switch as was
suggested.
I checked, because it wasn't written in the way I usually write
things,
and sure enough it wasn't code I wrote :-)
From the changelog for D 0.129: "Incorporated Ben Hinkle's new
std.format
which can print general arrays."
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog1.html#new0129
So people are liable to make the mistake.
Andrei
What about when you want to fall through to a multiple label? Or a
range
label?
case 0:
// do stuff
goto case ??;
case 1: .. case 9:
// do more stuff
goto case ??;
case 10,20,30:
// still more stuff
The obvious answer would seem to be just "pick any one".
I just bring it up because I haven't seen that ... uh case ...
mentioned by anyone.
--bb
Since
case a:
..
case b:
expands to
case a:
case a+1:
case a+2:
// ....
case b:
and
case a,b,c,d:
expands to
case a:
case b:
case c:
case d:
Your speculation is correct. Please note that the "goto case X;"
statement
works *now*, so there's no need to guess its behavior.
Seriously? Didn't realize.
So valid end-of-case statements would be:
break;
return;
continue;
goto *;
goto case *;
throw ...;
assert(...);
you can call functions which do these...
... which is where the "none"/"bottom" type comes into play!
Andrei
