On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 21:53:29 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 19:30:40 UTC, Chris Wright wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 15:19:57 +0000, Ignacious wrote:
[...]
LGPL is much more common, and LGPL isn't a problem when you
distribute by source. It *is* a problem with static linking
with binary distributions (which is the default for D).
This is not a new issue. Software licensing is a well
understood, well publicized concern. It doesn't merit alarmism.
Sure it does! Stop being a Nazi war criminal wanna be! Do you
work for the FOSSF? Otherwise known as the F-OSS-F = Future -
Office of Strategic Services - Foundation.
What is this thread accomplishing other than ranting about GPL
and calling others Nazis?
