On Tue, 2017-04-11 at 07:40 -0700, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Tuesday, April 11, 2017 14:21:57 Matthias Klumpp via Digitalmars-d > wrote: > > This will *not* solve the issues with Phobos breakage though, as > > Phobos is a shared library. > > It could always just be distributed as a static library. There > arguably > isn't much point in distributing it as a shared library anyway - > particularly when it's not ABI compatible across versions. I actively > avoid > having phobos as a shared library on my systems, because it just > causes > versioning problems when programs are built against it. All of those > problems go away with a static library. And so much of Phobos is > templated > anyway that there isn't even much to share. > > - Jonathan M Davis
Having played a bit with GtkD, you always want this as a shared library for development. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
