On Friday, 28 April 2017 at 09:02:19 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
On Friday, 28 April 2017 at 08:26:28 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
If it isn't sound then it isn't worth mentioning...
So you claim...
Actually, unsound lifetime management is worse than nothing as
far as correctness goes... so I guess it is worth mentioning as a
warning rather than a recommendation.
If D had ownership pointers then it would've been possible to
sort this out, but D is perpetually locked to the current
pointer/GC model for reasons that aren't particularly convincing,
i.e. beliefs.
