On Friday, 28 April 2017 at 14:59:46 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 28 April 2017 at 09:40:07 UTC, Moritz Maxeiner wrote:
I'm sorry, but that's just plain wrong. D does not have
ownership pointers because nobody that wants them has stepped
up and
1) Done the work of drafting an informal proposal that
*actually deals with _all_ of the issues involved*
Wrong. This has been discussed and hashed out to death over and
over again. The solutions are on the table.
No. Every single thread I read in the last couple of years ended
with Walter pointing out issues that need to be "hashed out" and
then nobody doing it.
Walter's position has always been that having more than a
single pointer type is a disaster.
None of the threads I've read in the last couple of years
regarding that support that claim.
That makes further work on it pointless.
What you consider worth working on is your business, of course :)
