On 2009-11-19 16:26:41 -0500, Walter Bright <[email protected]> said:

Unless such have a unique grammar that can be lexed and parsed:

     a :string: b

where string is the user defined name, so you can do things like:

     a :^^: b

and define your own pow operator. The problem with this approach is the sheer ugliness of it.

By the way, if you could omit the parenthesis for a one-argument function call, you could write things like this:

        a .pow b

--
Michel Fortin
[email protected]
http://michelf.com/

Reply via email to