On Tuesday, 16 May 2017 at 21:39:19 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
I agree with your points, but it doesn't necessarily preclude adding in/out statements. My only qualm is that they would seem very similar to scope statements. Perhaps scope(in) and scope(out(x)) or something like that. Would not break any code to do it.
I meant adding in/out statements without removing the in/out block functionality the way it is now.
