On Tuesday, May 30, 2017 06:13:39 Stanislav Blinov via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Tuesday, 30 May 2017 at 02:12:56 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > > That definition currently there is more precise than the > > definition on that page has been historically... > > Apparently, it is not. Do you have a reference to Walter's change > regarding `in` becoming just `const`? Because a change like that > should get reflected in the spec, otherwise we might just > continue to ignore said spec and expect our grievances to be > "gracefully" resolved later. What I mean is I'd rather see/make > the change reflected there...
There was a thread discussing it here: http://forum.dlang.org/post/zskxjpctdipbqalpw...@forum.dlang.org with Walter's main response being here: http://forum.dlang.org/post/o6m17i$1jh7$1...@digitalmars.com - Jonathan M Davis
