Bill Baxter, el 20 de noviembre a las 14:10 me escribiste: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Adam D. Ruppe > <destructiona...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 04:49:52PM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > >> 2. Octal literals! I think it'd be great to have a new octal syntax, or > >> even > >> better, a general any-positive-inter-base syntax. > > > > Both D and DMC accept 0b0000 as a binary literal. If 0x is hex, it seems > > logical that octal should be 0o10. > > > > It looks silly, but it fits the pattern, provides the literal for those > > who use it, and isn't valid right now. > > Exactly what I was thinking. 0o08. > Except I don't think it looks so silly. > And even if it does look silly, who cares. Octal literals *are* silly. :-)
And it is consistent with Python 3.0, if anybody cares ;) -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- La máquina de la moneda, mirá como te queda! -- Sidharta Kiwi