So, if a D3 gets developed _now_, i guess the compiler developers will create syntax issues again for those features and then we need a D4. Instead it might be better to collect more experience before thinking about D3
in my opinion starting with D3 is too early, because D-people
dont even seem to know how exactly to implement new exciting
features like "reference counting" (and how will "reference
counting" work together with the new "scope"-feature?).
- Re: Isn't it... Wulfklaue via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Isn't it... Sebastien Alaiwan via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Isn't it... Moritz Maxeiner via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Isn't it... Sebastien Alaiwan via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Isn't it... bachmeier via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Isn't it... Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Isn't it... Moritz Maxeiner via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Isn't it... ketmar via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Isn't it... Sebastien Alaiwan via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Isn't it... ketmar via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Isn't it about time for D3? meppl via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Isn't it about time for D3? meppl via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Isn't it about time for D3? solidstate1991 via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Isn't it about time for D3? aberba via Digitalmars-d
- Deprecating phobos modules [was: Re: I... Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Deprecating phobos modules [w... Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Deprecating phobos module... Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Deprecating phobos modules [w... Seb via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Deprecating phobos modules [w... Jesse Phillips via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Deprecating phobos module... Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d
- Re: Isn't it about time for D3? Mike via Digitalmars-d